Page 162 - DOCENCIA E INVESTIGACIÓN, MECANISMOS DE REFLEXIÓN Y CAMBIO EN LATINOAMÉRICA

REDES 02

Sontag, L. M., Clemans, K. H., Graber, J. A. and Lyndon, S. T. (2011). Traditional and cyber ag-
gressors and victims: A comparison of psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 40(4), 392-404.
Sticca, F. and Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the
differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying.
Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(5), 739-750.
Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. (2016). Decreasing risky behavior on social network
sites: The impact of parental involvement in secondary education interventions. The Journal of
Primary Prevention, 37(3), 247-261.
Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D. and Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on
the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and
Individual Differences, 98, 244-249.
Wölfer, R., Schultze, A., Zagorscak, P., Jäkel, A., Göbel, K. and Scheithauer, H. (2014). Prevention
Docencia e investigación, mecanismos de reflexión y cambio en Latinoamérica
2.0: Targeting cyberbullying@ school. Prevention Science, 15(6), 879-887.
Wright, M. F. (2015). Adolescents’ cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization: the lon-
gitudinal associations with school functioning. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 653-666.
You, S., Lee, Y. and Kim, E. (2015). Physical, Social, and Cyberbullying: Relationships with Ado-
lescents’ Psychosocial Factors. Child Indicators Research, 1-19.
Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J. and Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among
teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of youth and adoles-
cence, 42, 1063-1077.

162