Page 160 - Apuntes de Investigación en la Enseñanza de Idiomas
P. 160

144               Apuntes de Investigación en la Enseñanza de Idiomas



            Method

            In this exploratory study which is part of a wider project, we interviewed seven developing writers
            at different stages of development as writers in order to ascertain their prevailing beliefs with regard
            to writing and their own abilities in this regard. The writers we spoke to were identified by one of the
            researchers who works in the same university and the interviews were carried out by the other re-
            searcher in the context of a short workshop. The participants were interviewed separately, after only
            one day of the course, to avoid too much exposure to the other researcher’s discourse on writing and
            to identify their current state of beliefs. We asked participants three categories of question, current
            writing practices, feelings about feedback and success and their future as academic writers.

            All seven participants were women with different backgrounds and levels of education. All partici-
            pants had at least finished the formal part of a postgraduate degree. Some were finishing their MA
            dissertation, others had finished and moved on to PhD studies. Two had finished PhD studies and
            were establishing themselves as academic writers. We show the stages of development in Table 1.
            We include the stage of formal education, what the participant is currently writing and their expecta-
            tions for the future.




                                  Table 1: Participant stages of development as writers































            All interviews were transcribed broadly and analyzed using basic theme-based methods with the aim
            of identifying topics to form the basis for further research. All transcripts are in the participant actual
            words and so may not be grammatically correct (as is true of all speech). In transcribed sections any
            relevant non-verbal information (for example, laughter) is included in double brackets. Any transcribed
            sections reported below are between inverted commas and the participant is credited at the end.
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165